Satellite Conspiracy - Flat Earth Flight

Atat satelitii geostationari cat si cei orbitali (care orbiteaza la o altitudine mult mai joasa decat cea oferita oficial) folosesc Cosmic Ray Device inventat de Nikola Tesla ca sursa de energie.

WHAT IS NOT SAID ABOUT THE SATELLITES

A TESLA FREE RADIANT ENERGY TYPE IS SO SMALL THAT CAN BE CAMOUFLAGED EASILY

Brooklyn Eagle July 10, 1932 Nikola Tesla states:

I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. Cosmic ray investigation is a subject that is very close to me. I was the first to discover these rays and I naturally feel toward them as I would toward my own flesh and blood. I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan.

A satellite is a complex machine. All satellites are made up of several subsystems that work together as one large system to help the satellite achieve its mission. This simplified illustration shows the key parts of a remote-sensing satellite. The main subsystems are grouped by color.

http://www.smgaels.org/physics/97/MARIN32.GIF
http://www.nuenergy.org/images/gif/img00001.gif
http://www.thetech.org/hyper/satellite/images/anatomy.gif

With such a permanent supply of high quality energy, certainly the satellites are remote controlled from earth to make them go around or stay hovering in a specific place. They don't stay quite or moving because any gravity - which is a lie- but because the energy taken from those layers.

Cateva observatii extrem de interesante despre satelitii sistemului planetar geocentric:

http://www.geocentricperspective.com/geosat.pdf

http://www.fixedearth.com/geosynchronous_sa.htm

This is rather significant, since Kepler’s laws were formulated precisely to support the Heliocentric system, since Copernicancus’ original model of planets going around the sun in circular orbits had more problems than the Ptolemaic system it replaced. So what’s this tell us? That scientists simply have no explanation for why the GSS satellites work.

You asked me later in your letter if there was a “red flag.” Yes there is, but it’s in your camp, obviously, because here you have a satellite that doesn’t obey any of the Keplerian laws of orbiting bodies! But I do have an explanation. The GSS are not orbiting the earth. They are hovering over the earth. The next time you look at one of those satellite weather maps on TV which show a stationary earth but clouds moving across it in time-lapse photography, think about this.

As I said in my answer to your first Challenge, the GPS scientist abandons his Relativity theory in order to use a fixed-Earth for his calculations. You must understand that when they make the calculations for the GPS from a fixed-Earth position, they are not doing it for simulation or practice before they do the real thing. The article in Physics Today I gave you states that they must use fixed-Earth calculations, because they are the only ones that work. This gives me a chance to answer even better your first Challenge question, which concerned the GSS technician who positions the GSS while thinking that it is going 6800 mph. I have a letter from the Office of Satellite Operations in Washington DC concerning the repositioning of a GSS satellite 10.75 degrees, asking this question: “Is the present movement of GOES (a GSS satellite) planned and executed on the basis of a fixed earth or a rotating earth?” The answer, written by Lee Ranne from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on 11-22-1989 (I have her phone number if you want it) says “Fixed earth.”


Cum sunt modificate/retusate TOATE pozele/imaginile de satelit (Nasa, JPL, US govt., ESA):

Marturia unei foste angajate Nasa care ne spune cum sunt falsificate si manipulate toate fotografiile Nasa inainte de a fi oferite pentru massmedia:

A NASA Cover-Up

A former employee of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration reveals how NASA covers up and erases UFOs from satelite photos. But first a little bit about this former employee: DONNA TIETZE HARE.

Formerly of NASA, female slide technician, the recipient of numerous space awards including 1969 Apollo Achievement award from the National Aeronautics & Space Administration, 1973 Skylab award, a medallion for success on the Skylab-Suez Test project, numerous other awards for her skill as a technical Artist, honors, awards and a 1994 reccomdation by Texas Governor Ann Richards to the Advisory Committee of Psychology Associates. Donna Tietze has spent most of her professional life involved in the Space Program as a technical illustrator. She drew lunar maps, landing slides, she worked in the photo lab, Precision Slide Lab, reducing art work to one inch by one inch drawings. She drew launch sites, landing sites and was employed as a sub-contractor to NASA for over 15 years. She worked on flight manuals for astronauts & has the wonderful ability to put words into images but uniquely, learn to do everything backwards, including mathematical computations, the writing of words, to put it simply, this woman has seen just about all the different kinds of images one could see that are used in Space Programs.

Donna Tietze interviewed on Washington D.C. Radio Station

The following is a partial transcript of a radio talk show that occurred 5/6/95 on WOL-AM in Washington D.C. which is simulcast on WOLB-AM in Baltimore Maryland. The show is broadcast every Saturday night at 12:00am. The show is called 'UFOs Saturday Night'. The guests on that date were Stanley McDaniels, author of the McDaniel Report, Erol Toron, a cartographer and who provided valuable information for Richard Hoagland in preparing his book, 'The Monuments Of Mars'. Also on the program was keith Morgan, Dan Drazon and Donna Tietze, a former employee of NASA in Houston, Texas. The transcript was transcribed by Donald Ratsch, 'Operation Right To Know' (ORTK) from an audio recording of the show. Elaine Douglass (ORTK) host of the show:

Elaine Douglass: This is Elaine Douglass, WOL News-Talk Network, our show is UFOs Saturday night and here in the studio with Keith Morgan and our topic is the Face On Mars. We have a new guest on the air with us, Donna Tietze. Donna, you are also with three scientists who are on the air with us and that would be Stan McDaniels from California, Erol Toron from the east coast and Dan Drason whose in Colorado. The reason that I asked Donna to come on the show, Donna is in Houston, Texas and kind enough to join us tonight to tell us some very interesting things she observed while working at NASA. Donna is an educator and she is working on her Masters in Education. In the past Donna, as I understand it you held a position for 15 years with a contractor at the NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston. You were a photo technician?

Donna Tietze: Correct!

E.D.: Donna welcome to UFOs Saturday Night. Tell me and tell everyone the incident that you recall as they say in the law court, did there come a time when you walked in a photo lab and someone told you something quite astounding? What happened that day?

D.T.: Yes Elaine, that's true. During the Apollo mission I worked at NASA throughout those Apollo missions and I did leave NASA at the time the space shuttles began. I worked in building eight in the photo lab. I had a secret clearance so I thought I could go anywhere in the building. And I did go into one area that was a restricted area. In this area they developed pictures taken from satelites and also all of the missions, the Apollo missions, flight missions. I went in and I was talking to one of the photographers and developers and he was putting together a mosaic which is a lot of photos, smaller photos into a larger photo pattern. And while I was in there I was trying to learn new methods and new things about the whole organization and I was looking at the pictures and he directed my attention to one area, he said, Look at that. I looked and there was a round oval shaped, well it was very white circular shape of a dot and I, it was black & white photography, so I asked him if that was a spot on the emulsion and he said, well I can't tell you but spots on the emulsion do not leave round circles of shadows.

E.D.: So there was a shadow on the ground?

D.T.: Right, a round shadow! And I noticed that there were pine trees, now I don't know where this area was or what, you, pretty close to the ground what I saw but I didn't see outline of the continent. But I did notice that thre was shadow under this white dot and I also noticed that the trees were casting the shadows in the same direction as this shadow of the circle of this aerial phenomena because it was higher than the trees but not too much higher than the trees but it was close to the ground and it was spherical but slightly elongated, not very much but slightly. I then said, is it a UFO? And he said, Well I can't tell you. And then I asked him, what are you going to do with this piece of information? And he said, well we have to airbrush these things out before we sell these photographs to the public. So I realized at that point that there is a procedure setup to take care of this type of information from the public.

Despre faptul ca avioanele zboara in linie dreapta (cu exceptia decolarii/aterizarii):


http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/aerobatics/maneuvers/straight_and_inverted_flight.htm

As stated, an observer on the ground would see the air going almost straight down behind the plane. This can be demonstrated by observing the tight column of air behind a propeller, a household fan, or under the rotors of a helicopter; all of which are rotating wings. If the air were coming off the blades at an angle the air would produce a cone rather than a tight column. If a plane were to fly over a very large scale, the scale would register the weight of the plane.

When I am being proper and responsible, I am flying high, maybe even 3000 feet above the ground. From that height, on good days I can see almost forever around me, but the details of the ground below have started to blend together and flatten. The view becomes more oriented to the sky than the ground as I fly a straight line to my destination.

http://bobtilden.com/11E01.htm

Commercial aircraft prefer to fly “straight and level” because it is convenient. Air traffic controllers have to keep aircraft from flying into each other, and having pilots fly airplanes in straight lines makes a controller’s job possible. Also, people tend to get airsick when an airplane moves erratically, so straight and level flight makes things more comfortable for the passengers and crew.