De ce mancam ?

Cum o intrebare valida despre constiinta e "De ce mancam ?", de ce nu poate constiinta sa fie pur si simplu fara sa manance, am gasit in sfarsit o posibila explicatiei in "World as Will and Representation" a lui Schopenhauer:

"Sometimes several of the appearances of the will at the lower levels
of its objectivation – the inorganic levels – come into conflict with one
another since each, guided by causality, wants to take control of the matter
at hand. The appearance of a higher Idea will emerge from this conflict
and overpower all the less perfect Ideas that were there before, in such a
way that it lets their essence continue to exist in a subordinate manner
by taking an analogue of them into itself. This process is intelligible only
given the identity of the appearing will in all the Ideas and its striving for
higher and higher objectivation. Thus in the solidification of bones (for
instance) we see an unmistakable analogy with crystallization, which con-
trolled the calcium originally, although ossification can never be reduced
to crystallization. This analogy is weaker in the solidification of flesh. Sim-
ilarly, the combination of humoursa in the animal body, and secretion
as well, are analogues of chemical combination and separation. The laws
of chemistry do continue to operate here, although they are subordinate,
highly modified and overpowered by a higher Idea. That is why merely
chemical forces outside of an organism will never yield such humours;

A more perfect Idea will result from such a victory over several lower173
Ideas or objectivations of the will; and by absorbing an analogue of higher
power from each of the Ideas it overpowers, it will gain an entirely new
character: the will is objectified in a new and clearer fashion. It first arises
through spontaneous generation b and subsequently through assimilation
to the existing germ, organic humour, plant, animal, human being. The
higher appearance thus stems from the conflict between lower appearances,
swallowing the others up but also realizing all of their striving to the highest
degree. – Accordingly, here the law is already: ‘a serpent can become a
dragon only by devouring a serpent’."

Si Schopenhauer considera ca toate constiintele (el le numeste Idei, la fel ca si mine) sunt forme de manifestare ale aceluiasi Will. Iar scopul Will-ului este sa obtina ce mai profunda Idee, si modul prin care poate face asta e sa subjuge Idei mai mici prin asimilare in cadrul unei Idei mai profunde. Iar asta e ceea ce se observa in fenomenul mancarii: constiinte care se devoreaza una pe alta in directia crearii de Idei tot mai profunde, i.e. evolutia de la inorganic la organic, de la plante la animale la om.

No, niet, nu este asta explicatia

Si eu m-am tot intrebat, de ce unii mananca ce nu trebuie, adica mancarea aia care se mnanca de mai multe ori...

CAdi a scris:No, niet, nu este asta explicatia

De unde ai capatat obsesia asta cu facutul pe misteriosul ? Te-ai simtit neadecvat in scoala, baietii vrajind fetele cu cuvinte alese si tu nefiind la fel de bun ca ei la invartit cuvinte ai adoptat strategia facutului pe misteriosul in incercarea disperata de a ascunde faptul ca nu ai nimic de zis ? Ai 70 ani. Nu crezi ca pana la varsta asta ar fi trebuit sa iti fi vindecat deja traumele pubertatii ?

70? Mai am un ecart pana la aceasta varsta onorabila care se spune ca te face mai intelept.
Ti-am dat un indiciu pretios pe care nu l-ai bagat in seama.

Nu stau sa descifrez indicii de genul. Daca ai ceva de zis zici.