Eterul, eterul

www.einstein-website.de[/mention] a scris:Albert Einstein wrote his first scientific essay in the summer of 1895; he was only 16 years old. This essay Über die Untersuchung des Ätherzustandes im magnetischen Felde (On the Investigation of the State of the Ether in a Magnetic Field) was sent to his uncle Caesar Koch (1854-1941) for an expert’s opinion. In an accompanying letter to his uncle the young Einstein wrote: "If you are not going to read this stuff I will not be annoyed at all; but at least you have to recognize it as a shy attempt to fight against my being a bad letter writer, which I inherited from both my beloved parents." Einstein’s first "scientific work" has never been published.

negativ a scris:. . . . .
Si daca Nea a scris asta pe bune, ma mir, dar asa si este. Am cam fost luat în tarbaca atunci când am spus ca în Univers nu se misca nimic. Numai ca la vremea aia (la fel ca si acum), nu se concepe universul fara miscare, ceea ce absurd. Daca exista conceptul de miscare trebuie sa existe si opusul sau.
Indiferent însa ce si cum au spus altii am motive sa fiu convins ca "eterul" exista (desi eu am rezerve cu privire la denumire) si încerc sa-mi dezvolt teoria fara sa ma bazez pe teoriile altora, chiar daca ea corespunde de cale mai multe ori cu ele doar partial.[/justify]
https://cercetare.forumgratuit.ro/viewtopic.forum?t=2642

virgil_48 a scris:

negativ a scris:. . . . .
Si daca Nea a scris asta pe bune, ma mir, dar asa si este. Am cam fost luat în tarbaca atunci când am spus ca în Univers nu se misca nimic. Numai ca la vremea aia (la fel ca si acum), nu se concepe universul fara miscare, ceea ce absurd. Daca exista conceptul de miscare trebuie sa existe si opusul sau.
Indiferent însa ce si cum au spus altii am motive sa fiu convins ca "eterul" exista (desi eu am rezerve cu privire la denumire) si încerc sa-mi dezvolt teoria fara sa ma bazez pe teoriile altora, chiar daca ea corespunde de cale mai multe ori cu ele doar partial.[/justify]
https://cercetare.forumgratuit.ro/viewtopic.forum?t=2642

Care este opusul conceptului de miscare in Univers ? Universul rigid,
fix ...? Concept, poate fi,... ca sa avem ce nega. Dar model acceptabil
nu pare sa fie, odata ce vedem miscare si cu ochiul liber.

sandokhan a scris:Daca citim cu atentie Occult Chemistry, vom vedea ca nu numai Murray Gell-Mann (quarks) si Peter Higgs (boson) si-au copiat aceste concepte de acolo, dar si Paul Dirac (antimaterie) si J.J. Thompson (izotopi) au facut acelasi lucru.

Stabilitatea in timp a modelului orbital a ramas neexplicata pana in ziua de astazi; Bohr a adaugat date experimentale binecunoscute (constanta lui Rydberg fusese deja determinata experimental cu ani in urma), valorile discrete ale schemei nivelelor energetice, informatii despre frecventa liniilor spectrale emise de atomul de hidrogen, LA PRIMUL SAU POSTULAT, care tine de domeniul SF sau al basmelor. Pana in ziua de astazi, primul postulat ramane doar o ipoteza, complet neverificata, si, la cea mai mica investigatie din punct de vedere logic, complet falsa. Aceleasi date experimentale survin si sunt explicabile si din punctul de vedere al modelului aetheric, de asemenea si efectele Compton si Zeeman.

Dar Bohr a mers si mai departe, ironia sa subtila atingand noi culmi; a numit acest model orbital (imposibil) stare legata, sau UNDA STATIONARA, adica exact modelul atomului aetheric:



Despre descoperirile fundamentale (quarks, izotopi, antimateria, Higgs boson) din Occult Chemistry:

http://www.esotericscience.org/article5a.htm
www.iiyp.org/The_Amazing_Phenomenon.doc

De aceea Wilhelm Reich a fost asasinat in 1957, pentru ca a descoperit cel mai mare secret din spatele industriei nucleare si anume ca NU EXISTA nici un fel de industrie nucleara, de la inventarea conceptului de neutron (ca particula) de catre elevul lui Rutherford, J. Chadwick, la falsificarea experimentului despre fisiunea nucleara din 1939 de catre O. Hahn, L. Meitner si F. Strassmann, unde acesti conspiratori au ascuns fata de public ceea ce se cunostea inca din antichitate si anume transmutarea metalelor la temperatura obisnuita, vezi supersiteul:

http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep4/ep4alchem.htm

In 1951, W. Reich a pus un miligram de radium inauntrul unei Tesla/Orgon Box, o cutie care acumuleaza ether, captusita pe dinauntru cu foite metalice; contoarele Geiger au luat-o razna, articolul din New York Times, 3 Februarie 1951 relatand nivelul ridicat de radioactivitate intr-o zona cu raza de 600 de mile cu centrul in Rangley, Maine, adica locul unde era laboratorul lui Reich.

Astfel ne putem da seama cum functioneaza de fapt reactoarele 'nucleare'; sunt doar niste acumulatoare de ether, unde uraniul (din cauza densitatii, structura atomica se apropie foarte mult de ether) va radia energia provenita din ether; in loc de foitele metalice utilizate de Tesla si Reich, reactoarele 'nucleare' folosesc beriliu (ca reflector).

Experimentul din 1951 efectuat de Wilhelm Reich (pentru care a si fost arestat) care a aratat ca radiatia asa numita nucleara poate fi maximizata foarte usor folosind un acumulator de orgon si cateva mg. de radium...

Reich moved from New York to an area just outside the town of Rangeley in rural southern Maine in the early nineteen fifties. Here he built a new home and laboratory personally designed to integrate home and laboratory into a single, brilliantly practical building, now the home of the Wilhelm Reich Museum. Another laboratory was added soon after for students. This structure was the setting for the so-called Oranur Experiment, a chilling example of the accumulator’s undeniable ability to concentrate energy. The experiment called for the placing of a very small amount of radium in an accumulator, the unexpected result of which was to toxify a surprisingly large area of southern Maine surrounding his home and laboratory, one that took several months to dissipate.


Cum J.P. Morgan i-a angajat pe O. Heaviside si H. Lorentz pentru a decupa din ecuatiile originale ale lui Maxwell si astfel pentru a ascunde teoria adevarata e/m, cea a vortexurilor aetherice:

http://www.svpforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=696&sid=df49b40b0918509a3a67b10075bf83fc

In his text “Occult chemistry’s prediction of adyarium, element zero, the tetra-neutron”, Illert presents a comparison of the different levels of matter in occult chemistry and modern physics. It goes as follows:

E1 (anu): sub-quark level particles, or astral matter, in left and right-handed varieties.

E2: quark-level particles, of 12 different types, 6 quarks and 6 anti-quarks, each smaller than 10^-18 cms.

E3: vector (spinning) and scalar (non-spinning) mesons of approximate length 0,6×10^-13 cms. Spinning stretches the vector meson.

E4: nucleons such as the proton and neutron with approximate radius 0.9×10^-13 cms.

Three quarks on a triple-ended elastics (Nambu) string.

E5: the gas,

E6: the liquid,

E7: and solid phases of nuclear matter, as it exists in atomic nuclei with radii upto about 10^-12 cms.

(E1-E7 representing the corresponding levels of matter in occult chemistry)

De fapt, E1 Anu sunt ceea ce fizica cuantica actuala denumeste ca fiind OMEGONS.



Prima carte (una dintre cele mai senzationale) care a prezentat conceptul de Anu a fost Principles of Light and Color, o incursiune fascinanta in fizica cuantica (scrisa in 1878):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3277374/The-Principles-of-Light-and-Color-by-Edwin-D-Babbitt-1878

Atomii din planul astral formeaza acele filamente/corzi de lumina; ce este de fapt electricitatea:

Science of Seership, Geoffrey Hodson, Chapter II, capitolul The Electric Current:

http://books.google.ro/books?id=rpTuNO1QEnsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=science+of+seership#v=onepage&q=&f=false

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13399219/P-TompkinsThe-Secret-Life-of-NatureComplete (download in pdf format)

Paginile 12, 50, 54, 55; Ch. 7 * pg. 81 – 94 (92, omegons; 93, expl. quarks); Ch. 8 * pg. 95 - 101 (96, koilon bubbles; 100-101, string model); Ch. 9 * pg. 102 – 111 (106-111, electrons bubbles, lines of force), 126-127 four ethers



Marea Piramida de la Gizeh este creierul uman reprezentat la o scara uriasa.

ESP of quarks and strings

http://books.google.ro/books?id=5Qgfx4bXkT4C&dq=esp+quarks+phillips&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=NOJP9RGRxd&sig=7Rzl03GEsazklV9395zcmkGw0Jw&hl=ro&ei=0qqBSq6QApuYnQP-9szoCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#v=onepage&q=&f=false

Superarticolul Historical Evidence scris tot de S. Phillips:

http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_09_4_phillips.pdf

Aceste doua lucrari ar trebui sa fie studiate de studentii din liceu si facultati care isi doresc sa inteleaga cum functioneaza de fapt planul cuantic; veti gasi TOTUL, de la adevarata teorie a corzilor, la explicatii exceptionale cu privire la toate fenomenele observate, prin experimente, ale planului cuantic/aetheric.

DR STEPHEN PHILLIPS earned his Ph.D. at the University of California, where he also taught mathematics and physics. In 1979 one of his scientific papers was published, proposing a theory that unified particle interactions and predicted that quarks are not fundamental (as most physicists currently believe) but are composed of three more basic particles ('subquarks') which, may have since been detected at FermiLab, high-energy physics laboratory near Chicago in America. He has lectured on his research at the Cavendish Laboratory of Cambridge University, to the Society for Psychical Research, to the Theosophical Society and at the 1996 Summer School of the Dharma Center of Canada, a Buddhist meditational retreat outside Toronto, Canada. His work has appeared in several academic journals, popular magazines and newspapers. He was the British physicist who published three books discussing the clairvoyant investigations on matter (occult chemistry) done by Leadbeater and Besant. They thought they were describing atoms, but Phillips recognized that they were actually describing subatomic particles.